The Minds Of Humans Are Imperfect - 1121 Words

The minds of humans are imperfect. It is for this reason that it is often easy to mistake fantasies and reality. Fantasies can be described as wishful thinking, as imagining something perfect and they may or may not have their roots based on reality. Therefore, reality is what we can deduce from the fives senses and experience. In Don Quixote, by Miguel de Cervantes, many different kinds of women are encountered throughout the adventures of Don Quixote. There are poor peasants, rich vassals, prostitutes, and even shepherdess. Women in this novel seem to fall under either women of fantasy or as a women of reality. There is a stark difference between the two groups of women, but sometimes they are so sublime that they may even jump between women of fantasy and those of reality. Dorotea, the rich peasant and wife of the nobleman Don Fernando, and Luscinda, a very wealthy women and wife to Cardenio, would fall explicitly into the category of sublime women which can transcend from reality to fantasy and work their way between either realm. Dulcinea and Aldonza Lorenza fall into categories the very contrasting categories of fantasy and reality, respectively. Therefore, Luscinda, Dorotea, and Dulcinea serve as the fantastical ideals that men desire women to be, but truth of the matter is that most women of the time were what Aldonza Lorenzo was a women of reality. As far as the most ordinary woman of the three fantastical women of part I, Luscinda is the one that most fits thatShow MoreRelatedDeception Is Incompatible With God1451 Words   |  6 Pagesthere is a relationship between God and this untruthful behavior, an individual is also claiming that there is a flaw (or â€Å"imperfection†) in God. However, He can t be perfect and imperfect at the same time. So, God cannot be deceptive in any sense, because it would be saying that God is malicious, weak, and imperfect. 2. p. 82, paragraph beginning Still this is not. In the prior paragraph Descartes argued that God did not give him a faculty expressly for the purpose of making errors. But nowRead MoreDescartes Argument of God1540 Words   |  7 Pagesbelieves that there are properties that are inherently perfect. For example, being good is a perfection while being bad is an imperfection. A perfect being has all the perfections as properties. We have an idea of such a being as God. Premise 2: â€Å"Our minds are not infinite.† To begin this argument, Descartes entertains the idea that he cannot be certain of anything in the world, that everything known to him could be the result of an evil spirit’s deception. The only assurance he finds is â€Å"Cogito ErgoRead MoreOn the Essence of God Essay936 Words   |  4 PagesThe existence of God has been questioned and asked by many human beings since they were given revelations. A clear answer to the question has not yet been verified nor proven to be true by anyone and philosophers trying to prove so have failed too. Regardless of the disappointing search for God’s existence people still have hope and believe in God. Humans never stop seeking for a supreme being other than themselves, and when they prove God’s existence similar to how Descartes does, it opens up aRead MoreEvil : Evil And Evil1300 Words   |  6 PagesIf we are living in a world that was created by a perfect being, why are there imperfect aspects? If this ultimate being or creator (I will say God for purpose of this paper) is fundamentally good and moral, and is even unable to create evil, then how did evil come to be in the life we are living? According to the problem of evil, if there is a God, there is no evil. But because there is evil in the world, the conclusion can be drawn that there is no God (Sober). At first glance, this argument isRead MoreDescartes: Proofs of God/Deception and Error Essay1093 Words   |  5 Pagesevaluate the two proofs of Gods existence. How are they different? Is one more convincing than the other? Why did Descartes think he needed two proofs? Do they do different work for him? And secondly: Does Descartes give a satisfactory account of human error, given a perfect and divine creator? Are Descartes arguments convincing, or does it still seem unnecessary and less than perfect that God created us with flaws? Attachments Submission: Name: Augustina Ossimetha Danny Brown Phil 1301 Read More The Birthmark by Nathaniel Hawthorne Essay1289 Words   |  6 PagesFirst Paper - The Birthmark by Nathaniel Hawthorne As human beings, we are NOT perfect! It is part of our nature to be flawed one way or another. But there are some who choose to believe the opposing view. The theme of Nathaniel Hawthornes short story The Birthmark is how humans fight forcefully against Nature for perfection. It is those humans who, eventually, learn that Nature cannot be changed or revised. Aylmer was a famous scientist and philosopher who achieved great wonders.Read More Humans Senses and Perceptions Essay examples1418 Words   |  6 Pagesthing is what he thinks it is -- in other words, not a thing, but a think.† The combination of imperfect sensory organs, selective perception and varying interpretations of the sense data we receive accounts for this â€Å"err.† To begin with, our eyes do not â€Å"see† as clearly as we think they do. The actual raw image coming from our eyes is upside down, blurry and interlaced with blood vessels. Then, our mind corrects this image and fills in the gaps with whatever it presumes to be correct. However, ourRead MoreDescartes : The Existence Of God1682 Words   |  7 Pagesreality from the highest to the lowest level of reality: infinite substances, finite substances and modes. An infinite substance (God) consists of a higher level of formal reality and exists independently from everything else, whereas finite substances (human) exists independently of everything but God, followed by modes which consists of even less formal reality. After classifying the ideas and distinguishing the two types of realities, Descartes can make the progression to the sub-conclusion as follows:Read MoreExplain the Relationship Between Plato’s Form of the Good and the Other Forms.994 Words   |  4 PagesExplain the relationship between Plato’s Form of the Good and the other Forms. Plato was a dualist and so believed that human beings consisted of two parts- body and soul. This view is portrayed throughout Plato’s famous theory of the Forms of which he suggests that true substances are not physical bodies, but are the eternal Forms that our bodies are merely the imperfect copy. In his Theory he tells of a World of Forms representing knowledge, which he also names the ‘real’ world and the worldRead MoreSocrates s Quest Of Truth1337 Words   |  6 Pagesfor every particular and imperfect thing in the world of becoming (appearance), there is a corresponding reality, which is its absolute and perfect form in the world of being. For instance, the material world we live in is a poor imitation of the â€Å"real† world. Plato states that the material world is always changing and imperfect because he believed that there is a difference between that which we perceive with our senses and that which we understand innately with our minds. Therefo re, we rely in our